
Roll cages are vital within UK and many European supply chains for the storage and transport of goods. Whether moving milk between retailers, transferring merchandise between distribution centres, or carrying parcels between post offices and logistics hubs, roll cages help keep goods organised and flowing efficiently.
Yet, no matter who owns them, manufacturers, DCs, 3PLs, freight operators, or poolers, one challenge remains universal: roll cages frequently go missing. Sometimes they’re borrowed for too long, hoarded, stolen, or misused. The consequences ripple through operations, resulting in increased costs, inefficiencies, penalties, and even insurance issues. It’s not just about replacing equipment, it’s about the broader toll on logistics performance.
Thomas Scheibel, CEO and Gareth Mitchell, UK Partner Manager, of Heliot Europe (UK) Ltd explain how organisations can track these vital, hardworking, underappreciated pieces of equipment more effectively, to maintain supply chain efficiency and enhance traceability.
Theft, Misuse, and Human Error: Why Roll Cages Go Missing
Roll cages, like other categories of reusable supply chain transit items, are one the unsung heroes of modern logistics. Whether they’re transporting milk, electronics, or parcels, they ensure goods are moved securely and efficiently across supply chains. But while they play a vital role in day-to-day operations, roll cages often vanish, sometimes permanently, sometimes temporarily, creating headaches and costs for businesses.
Whether owned by manufacturers, distribution centres, 3PLs, or pooling companies, roll cages are prone to going missing. Causes range from theft and misuse to extended borrowing and simple human error. Whatever the reason, the consequences are real: increased costs, reduced efficiency, and strained logistics.
Why Roll Cages Go Missing
Roll cages, also known as roll pallets, are typically made of steel, aluminium, or plastic. These materials are valuable, and during periods of high demand or price volatility, they attract unwanted attention. Theft is all too common. In other cases, opportunistic thieves target the goods inside, or even staff mistakenly or deliberately reroute cages.
Yet it’s not always criminal. Often, roll cages are lost to confusion and error. They all look much the same, and with multiple deliveries happening simultaneously at busy depots, it’s easy for staff to send a cage back with the wrong truck. A milk delivery might be returned with the beer distributor’s vehicle, simply because the cages are indistinguishable.
Such mix-ups happen more often than people realise, across retail, postal, and manufacturing sectors. Identifying and rectifying these errors is often a manual process, costing time and labour resources that could be better spent elsewhere.
Inventory Isn’t Just About Theft

Operationally, many businesses hoard roll cages just to be safe. Without real-time visibility, site managers may stockpile more than needed, or borrow from neighbouring depots. This leads to inefficient intra-site logistics, poor use of space, and over-investment in assets. All of which could be avoided with a clearer answer to the question: “Where is it?”
Sustainability and Financial Impact
There’s also a broader issue at play: sustainability. Abandoned cages sometimes end up in waterways or community spaces. When this happens, companies may face local council fines for fly-tipping. And repeated cage replacement isn’t just bad for budgets—it’s wasteful.
The financial implications stack up quickly. A single roll cage might cost around £200 to replace. For a fleet of 50,000, losing 10% annually adds up to £1 million per year. Over five years, that’s £5 million lost, not counting associated logistics costs, delays, or the impact on customer service.
A Smarter Approach: Track, Don’t Chase
The good news? The technology to solve this problem already exists. Instead of sending staff to chase missing equipment, businesses can deploy simple, cost-effective radio devices that transmit each cage’s location.
These devices ping regularly, feeding data into networks that combine GPS, LPWAN (Low Power Wide Area Network), SubGHz, and WiFi-sniffing where needed. Artificial intelligence helps interpret this data, placing each cage on a digital map.
Heliot Europe, which tracks more than one million roll cages daily across Europe, has focused on keeping these systems as simple as possible. Their approach requires no GPS or WiFi inside facilities, minimising cost and energy usage. LPWAN technology, in particular, offers low-data, long-range communication that keeps both device and network costs low.
With this infrastructure, companies can set up geo-fences, receive alerts when cages leave their network, and better forecast equipment needs. They can also track assets across countries with ease, making this a scalable solution for pan-European supply chains.
Conclusion
Roll cages may not make headlines, but their loss causes serious disruption. Whether stolen, misused, or simply misplaced, missing roll cages lead to higher costs, lost time, and unnecessary waste.
Sensor-based tracking offers a clear answer. It improves operational efficiency, supports sustainability goals, and gives businesses control over a vital logistics asset. For organisations ready to modernise their material handling, it’s no longer a question of if they should track roll cages, but how soon they can start.
Related Articles
Innovative tracking solution for roll cages
Next Generation Rolling Container System from Loadhog featuring Dolly Max
Slovenian Post begins roll cage tracking with Sigfox 0G technology
Austrian Post Tracks Roller Containers
Rick LeBlanc, EMBA, is the founder and editor of Reusable Packaging News (subscribe to the free newsletter) and editor of Western Pallet Magazine. A supply chain journalist with more than 30 years of experience, he specializes in pallets, reusable packaging, material handling and related operations. Rick is co-author of Pallets: A North American Perspective and Pallets & Progress: A Collected History of Pallets and Palletized Handling 1922–1945. He is also an advisory board member of the Virginia Tech Center for Packaging and Unit Load Design. Read Rick’s full bio.


