Editor’s note: The following position paper was submitted by Green Spider Reusable Pallet Wraps in response to the European Commission’s proposed exemption of pallet wrappings and straps from Article 29(2) and (3) of the Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR). For broader regulatory context, see our coverage of the Delegated Decision on pallet wrap exemptions.
As the EU moves to enforce ambitious reuse targets under the Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR), Green Spider Reusable Pallet Wraps argues that reusable pallet wraps must remain firmly within the regulation’s circular economy framework.
Authors: Patrick Owens and Jessie Jia
The EU Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR), effective January 2025, establishes reuse targets for transport packaging, including pallet wrappings and straps. Article 29 mandates that 40% of transport packaging be reusable by 2030 (rising to 70% by 2040), with 100% reuse requirements for certain intra-company and intra-Member State transport operations.

File photo: Patrick Owens speaking at PACK EXPO Las Vegas.
Green Spider supports these regulatory objectives and urges policymakers to maintain strong reuse signals rather than introduce broad exemptions that could weaken circular economy momentum.
Recent studies commissioned by single-use packaging industry associations advocate for exemptions from reuse targets. While these studies identify transitional challenges, Green Spider argues they understate long-term environmental benefits, underestimate achievable trip rates, and overlook emerging automation-compatible reusable technologies.
1. Regulatory Context and Market Scale
The PPWR represents a structural shift in European packaging policy. For transport packaging — particularly high-volume, business-to-business materials — reuse targets are intended to retain material value within logistics systems rather than cycling it through single-use disposal streams.
Industry data suggest that single-use plastic transport packaging in Europe exceeds 2 million tonnes annually, with stretch wrap representing a significant share. Article 29 was designed to redirect that volume toward higher-retention systems.
A draft European Commission Delegated Decision (December 2025) proposes exempting pallet wrappings and straps from the 100% reuse requirements of Article 29(2) and (3), citing economic constraints and adaptation costs estimated at approximately €610 million.
Green Spider contends that such an exemption would arrive before infrastructure maturation and could dampen investment signals necessary to scale reuse systems.

File photo: Jessie Jia, Chief Executive Officer at Green Spider Reusable Pallet Wraps.
2. Addressing Industry Concerns
2.1 Environmental Performance
Life cycle assessments (including ifeu, April 2025) suggest that under certain modeled assumptions, single-use plastic film with recycled content may demonstrate lower environmental impacts than some reuse systems.
Green Spider argues that these assessments rely on conservative assumptions that may not reflect optimized reuse conditions — including low trip rates (often fewer than 20 cycles), inefficient return logistics, and exclusion of lightweight textile-based reuse formats.
According to Green Spider, reusable pallet wrap systems operating in controlled loops can exceed 50 cycles and in some cases reach several hundred rotations. At higher trip counts, environmental performance differentials narrow or reverse in favor of reuse.
2.2 Economic Viability
The RDC Environment study (March 2025) projects potential production cost increases ranging from 0.3% to 15.9%, depending on sector. Green Spider acknowledges transitional capital expenditures but characterizes these costs as front-loaded investments that decline as systems scale.
The company reports customer cases where multi-year deployment reduces cumulative film purchasing costs and disposal handling, improving lifecycle economics once infrastructure is amortized. Reported savings vary by trip frequency, loop discipline, and handling environment.
2.3 Technical Feasibility
The Fraunhofer IMWS study (April 2025) examines degradation risks in reusable strapping systems. Green Spider notes that modern reusable wrap designs employ different engineering principles, including non-welded fastening mechanisms, modular repairability, and woven textile durability.
While automated large-scale reusable wrapping remains limited today, Green Spider argues that regulatory clarity can accelerate technological development rather than delay it.
3. Policy Recommendations
- Maintain Article 29 reuse ambition while allowing targeted, evidence-based flexibility where reuse is demonstrably impractical.
- Encourage infrastructure development through innovation funding and pilot programs.
- Establish performance-based standards focused on trip count, durability, and recovery rates.
- Require transparent lifecycle modeling using realistic reuse assumptions.
- Support sector-specific pilots in retail, food and beverage, and manufacturing logistics.
4. Conclusion
The transition to reusable transport packaging presents structural challenges but also long-term environmental and economic opportunity.
Green Spider argues that broad exemptions risk slowing innovation and weakening circular economy signals embedded in the PPWR framework. In its view, regulatory consistency — paired with calibrated flexibility — offers a more effective pathway than categorical exemption.
The PPWR establishes the framework. The market now determines how ambition translates into scalable systems.
For more information: www.greenspiderpalletwraps.com
Expert guest authors are encouraged to share their perspectives at PackagingRevolution.net. Reach out to rick@packagingrevolution.net to find out more. (subscribe to the free newsletter).


